Solving Tax Problems For Over 40 Years

Contact Us
Solving Tax Problems For Over 40 Years
John P. Tyler

John P. Tyler

Counsel / Atlanta

John P. Tyler of John Tyler & Associates, LLC also serves as Counsel in the Tax Practice of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP.

  • Full Bio

    Mr. Tyler is an attorney as well as a certified public accountant who focuses in the areas of tax planning and controversy. As part of his practice, Mr. Tyler has developed an expertise working with energy and other federal income tax credits.

    Mr. Tyler graduated from Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania in 1968 with a B.A. in economics and subsequently served as an officer in the U.S. Navy. He received the J.D. from Emory University School of Law in 1973, where he earned the American Jurisprudence awards in Corporate Taxation, Taxation of Corporate Reorganizations, and Trial Practice.

    After graduating from Emory, Mr. Tyler joined the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen & Co. where he practiced tax planning. In 1976, he joined the Carter-Mondale Presidential Campaign where he served as Assistant Controller for the National Campaign. In 1977, he joined the staff of the Regional and District Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service where he represented the IRS in U.S. Tax Court, as well as in handling criminal tax and collection matters. In 1979, Mr. Tyler joined an Atlanta law firm where he later became a partner, practicing primarily in the issues of tax controversies, real estate, corporation, partnership and personal tax planning. Mr. Tyler has successfully litigated in the U.S. Tax Court, several District Courts and Federal Courts of Appeal.

    Mr. Tyler is a member of the American Bar Association (section on taxation) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He has also presented continuing legal education on several topics including: Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, Basics of IRS Collections, and Update on IRS Appeals Procedures-2015. Mr. Tyler has an AV Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell.

    Revise the last paragraph to: He has worked with several animal rights, not-for-profit organizations including Friends of Duncan which he co-founded and lobbied successfully to make animal cruelty a felony in Georgia. John is currently serving as the Director of the Georgia Pet Coalition and Animal Protection Society.

    Mr. Tyler is the author of Alpha & Omega: The Commandments of Jesus.

  • Representative Experience

    Significant Cases:

    • Estate of David Lovins, Sr., v. Commissioner, (U.S. T.C. 2016).Mr. Tyler and Mr. Rollins, successfully resolved a substantial docketed estate valuation case. The decedent and his wife died simultaneously, leaving dozens of apartment complexes and single-family residences to his heir. IRS adjustments to the valuations reported by the estate resulted in a demand for $9.4 million from the estate. Mr. Tyler and Mr. Rollins successfully negotiated a settlement with the IRS of approximately $300,000 in taxes and interest.
    • New Phoenix Sunrise Corp. v. Commissioner, 408 Fed. Appx. 908 (6th Cir. 2010)
    • American Boat Company, LLC v. U.S., 583 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2009). Mr. Rollins and Mr. Tyler successfully defended a taxpayer in District Court in a highly publicized Son of BOSS tax shelter case. American Boat is the leading case for a taxpayer’s use of a reasonable cause defense in a tax shelter. The case has been cited numerous times by both courts and scholarly articles. The case was appealed by the United States and Mr. Rollins and Mr. Tyler were again successful in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
    • Atlantic American Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, (U.S. T.C. 1995). Mr. Tyler successfully defended the first docketed case before the Tax Court under Internal Revenue Code § 845 (reinsurance). The case was resolved in the taxpayer’s favor with a finding of no deficiencies.
    • Penrod v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 1415 (1987). Mr. Tyler successfully defended a tax free reorganization in which taxpayers exchanged sixteen McDonald’s franchises for McDonald’s stock. The case remains the leading case for continuity of interest in a tax-free reorganization.
    • Frank Genzer, Et. Al. v. Commissioner. Mr. Tyler successfully defended a real estate case in which the IRS asserted deficiency in excess of $9,000,000,000 and we settled for a refund in excess of $50,000.
  • Bar Admissions

    Georgia

  • Education

    Undergraduate
    Bucknell University

    Law School
    Emory University

  • Memberships

    American Bar Association, Taxation

    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

  • Recognitions

    AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell®

  • Publications
  • Other Publications
Services

Services

John Tyler helps people solve tax problems and represents them in the litigation process with over 40 years of great results, including:

  • Over 100 closed United States Tax Court Docketed cases prior to 1987, including representation of Internal Revenue Service District Council.
  • Over 100 closed United States Tax Court Docketed cases since 1987, including cases in the downloadable list below.

Possibilities and Probabilities for Resolution of Tax Problems

Contact Us
  • <p>Over 90% of United States Tax Court Docketed cases are resolved without trial.</p>

    Over 90% of United States Tax Court Docketed cases are resolved without trial.

  • <p>The Rules of the United States Tax Court are designed to encourage settlement.</p>

    The Rules of the United States Tax Court are designed to encourage settlement.

  • <p>Taxpayer and IRS are required to stipulate all documentary evidence at the beginning of a trial unless there is a question of authenticity.</p>

    Taxpayer and IRS are required to stipulate all documentary evidence at the beginning of a trial unless there is a question of authenticity.

  • <p>Settlements are based on the risks of litigation.</p>

    Settlements are based on the risks of litigation.

  • <p>The United States Tax Court generally requires briefs analyzing facts and law after a trial and generally does not make a decision until several months after the trial.</p>

    The United States Tax Court generally requires briefs analyzing facts and law after a trial and generally does not make a decision until several months after the trial.

Landmark Cases

Landmark Cases

  • American Boat Company v. United States of America -

    Cited over 100 times for Reasonable Cause as a Defense to Tax Shelter Penalties

  • Penrod v. Commissioner -

    Cited over 500 times for Continuity of Interest and Step Transaction Doctrine

  • Check out this article from the Journal of Taxation (WG&L).